Great Wok

December 5, 2022 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings11
critical findings5

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Cleaning Procedure (P)critical

Inspector note: At the time of ispection handsink was being used for purposes other than handwashing- Remove and discontinue using handsink for other purpose than handwashing Train staff for handwashing only PIC had staff COS
code 590.002/2-301.12-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Packaged and Unpackaged Food-Separation Packaging and Segregation (P)critical

Inspector note: Whole shell egss stored in walk in cooler over ready to eat vegetables also raw chicken stored over ready to eat food - Properly store all poultry on bottom rack not over ready to eat foods or other proteins to prevent ross contamination
code 590.003/3-302.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
(A)(2) and (B) Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Hot and Cold Holding (P)critical

Inspector note: Chicken wings stored inside of low boy was 54F- Staff said been there 45 minutes- Properly remove and store in walk in until reach 41F or below COS
code 590.003/3-501.16-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Preventing Contamination from Hands (P)critical

Inspector note: Staff with bare hands was prepping ready to eat vegetables and another staff member was placing raw dumplings inside of a bag with bare hands- minimize bare hand contact with ready to eat foods train staff to properly wash hands and don gloves as they prep.
code 590.003(C)/3-301.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Equipment Food-Contact Surfaces and Utensils-Frequency (P)critical

Inspector note: Soiled can opener with food particles and rust Soiled knives on clean rack- Remove all soiled utensils and properly clean by washing rinsing and sanitizing then air dry before storing. Staff was observed discarding raw beef then rinsing bowl inside of sanitizer bay of the sink- I had him discontinue and properly wash rinse and sanitize train staff
code 590.004/4-602.11-P*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Clean-up of Vomiting and Diarrheal Events (Pf)

Inspector note: At the time of inspection No vomit and Diarrhea kit available- Provide supplies and instructions for vomit and diarrhea kit- Sent an email with list of supplies
code 590.002/2-501.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Ready-To-Eat Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food Date Marking (Pf)

Inspector note: Prepared foods inside of walk in does not have date - Date mark all prepared food stored in walk for 24 hours or more
code 590.003/3-501.17-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Food Temperature Measuring Devices (Pf)

Inspector note: At the time there was no Temperature mesuring device - Provide a working food thermometer to temp foods
code 590.004/4-302.12-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Using a Handwashing Sink-Operation and Maintenance (Pf)

Inspector note: Raw Noodles stored inside of a large bowl inside handsink- Discontinue storing food and food particles inside handwash sink - Keep handwash sink clear for easy accessibilty for staff. COS
code 590.005/5-205.11-PF** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Wiping Cloths Use Limitation (C)

Inspector note: There were wiping cloths stored all throughout soiled and not in sanitizer solution- Store all wiping cloths in sanitizer solution
code 590.003/3-304.14-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Nonfood Contact Surfaces (C)

Inspector note: Soiled Microwave counter tops hood fryolator with black oil and cookline stove and wok area all soiled - Clean to remove soils and dust and engrusted grease
code 590.004/4-602.13-C* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on September 12, 2022: 11 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Roxbury

See every restaurant in Roxbury →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.