✕
Intermission Tavern
April 30, 2009 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings10
- critical findings1
Failed findings
-
Consumer AdvisoriescriticalInspector note: complete consumer advisory for all menu's.
-
Food Contact Surfaces DesignInspector note: Replace scored cutting boards at 3 Dr. unit.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Replace or Repair defective door gaskets.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Clean all equip. sinks and all refrigeration units.
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Repair leaking plumbing.
-
Adequate Number Frequency Vermin ProofInspector note: provide covers for all trash receptacles.
-
Outside Storage Improperly MaintainedInspector note: clean grease container storage cabinets and exterior grown. Remove stagnant water from grown.
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: clean floor throughout.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Clean ceiling tiles at Kitchen area. Clean Walls degrease as needed and provide last hood cleaning info.
-
Rooms and Equipment VentedInspector note: Provide ventilation.
Checks marked passed
-
Separation Segregation Cross ContaminationcriticalInspector note: Properly store all raw foods eggs and fish shall be Store below ready to eat foods.
-
Food Contact Surfaces Clean
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: cover all foods during storage. Relocate all customer Ice stored with cold plate.
-
Food Utensil StorageInspector note: Remove cups used for dispensing.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: Provide Hand signage at Hand wash sink.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on April 23, 2009: 10 findings recurred. 5 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Chinatown
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.