Island Style Inc.

May 1, 2019 · Fail

🪳cooked

official resultFail
resultFail
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings15
critical findings3

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Hot Holdingcritical

Inspector note: 1.Hot Holding - Fish at 130F. Held within 2hrs. Corrected by PIC removed and reheated to 176F. 2. Hot Holding - Cabbage 129F-132F. Held within 2 hrs. Corrected by PIC removed and reheated to 205F 3. Jerk Chicken 113F. Held within 2 hrs. Corrected by PIC removed and reheated.
code 03-3-501.16*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Cleancritical

Inspector note: Washing and rinsing dirty pots without sanitizing. Provide proper wash-rinse-sanitizing steps.
code 20-4-703.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
PIC Performing Dutiescritical

Inspector note: PIC not performing duties per violations sited. Ensure hot holding monitored. Employees properly wash-rinse-sanitizing. Proper cooling methods used. Employees trained on employee illness policy. PIC took corrective action to reheat hot held foods to 165F or higher.
code M-2-103.11*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: 1. Grease build up on fryalator. Clean to remove 2. Interior of produce refridgerator heavily soiled with foods. Clean to remove
code 22-4-601/602.11** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Insects Rodents Animals

Inspector note: Live rat in trash area at rear of establishment. Provide pest control report.
code 35-6-501.111/.115** · serious findingstatus: Fail
Inadequate Facilities/Cooling Methods

Inspector note: Refrigerator - Rice & Beans at 53F White rice at 45F both tightly wrapped in plastic inside of a deep container. Discontinue and provide adequate cooling procedures.
code 04-3-501.15/4-301.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Food Contact Surfaces Design

Inspector note: 1. Rice bin heavily soiled and in disrepair. Replace 2. Heavily soiled food containers. Replace
code 14-4-202.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces

Inspector note: 1.Seal on blue warmer with excess glue and in disrepair. Replace 2. Oven knobs missing. Replace 3. Aluminum foil wrapped on top of hood. Remove 4. Resurface and seal wooden shelf onbottom of prep table.
code 15-4-202.16* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Dishwashng Facilities

Inspector note: 3 bay sink has crack on the side. Repair.
code 16-4-501.11/.15* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: 1.Exterior of produce refrigerator heavily soiled. Clean to remove 2. Exterior of equipment heavily soiled. Clean to remove. 3. Inside oven racks heavily soiled. Clean to remove.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue Signage

Inspector note: No paper towels in bathroom. Provide
code 32-6-301.11-02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Outside Storage Improperly Maintained

Inspector note: Remove old equipment and maintain clean.
code 34-5-501.111/.115* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Improper Maintenance of Floors

Inspector note: Floor with heavy soils under around and behind cooking equipment. Clean to remove.
code 36-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
premises not properly maintained or cleaned

Official wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
Inspector note: Excess grease and dust build up on hood. Clean to remove.
code 37-6-501.11-.12* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail
Premises Maintained

Inspector note: 1. Open mop sink in kitchen. Enclose 2. Mop and brooms being stored on the floor. Discontinue and provide proper storage.
code 42-6-501.113/.114* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Pass on January 8, 2019: 15 findings appeared for the first time.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Roxbury

See every restaurant in Roxbury →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.