?

Liriano Restaurant

February 11, 2009 · Administrative record filed

🫥not rated

official resultAdministrative record filed
inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
failed findings1
critical findings0

📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.

← Back to the current restaurant page

Failed findings

Non-Food Contact Surfaces Clean

Inspector note: Vents above stove top with visible grease build-up. Service for hoods and vents scheduled for 3/24/09. Condenser of small 2 door cooler with ice build-up. Defrost to remove.
code 23-4-602.13* · lower-severity findingstatus: Fail

Checks marked passed

Cold Holdingcritical

Inspector note: Beans left out on top of stove at 77F. PIC stated they had been left there for 45 minutes. PIC put in oven and reheated to 165F to ensure no bacterial growth. • Chicken in front hot holding unitat 125F. PIC stated it had been put out 2.5hrs prior. PIC removed and reheated to 165F to ensure no bacteial growth. Maintain all PHF'S at 140F or higher.
code 03-3-501.16(A)*** · critical food-safety factorstatus: Pass
Clean Cloths Hair Restraint

Inspector note: Employee observed not wearing a hair restraint while in kitchen preparing food. Address.
code 13-2-304/402.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Equipment Thermometers

Inspector note: No thermometers in upright basement refrigerators. Provide.
code 17-4-204.112/.115* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass
Installed and Maintained

Inspector note: Pipe under 3 bay sink leaking. Repair.
code 29-5-201/02.11* · lower-severity findingstatus: Pass

What changed since the previous inspection?

Compared with Fail on February 3, 2009: 1 finding recurred. 5 previous findings did not recur.

Browse this restaurant's inspections

More restaurants in Roxbury

See every restaurant in Roxbury →

About this record

This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.

Source: Analyze Boston.