?
Mcdonalds
July 10, 2008 · Administrative hearing
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative hearing
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings7
- critical findings1
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Times as a Public Health ControlcriticalInspector note: Time as a Public Health Protection not in use. Tomatoes 61° F.
-
Food Contact Surfaces Clean
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: Wiping cloths not properly Stored
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Many surfaces sticy and soiled. sinks counters etc
-
Installed and MaintainedInspector note: Hot Water not all the Hands Sinks. Kitchen And bathrooms
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: Floor dirty around baseboard and equipment
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Walls behind dishwashing equipment hare mildew build up around attached fixtures and surrounding area
Checks marked passed
-
Cold HoldingcriticalInspector note: Chicken in freezes had defrosted. temperature of unit on door 23° F. No thermometer inside unit. • Salad temperatures 57°) 60° F
-
PIC Performing DutiescriticalInspector note: CO 2 tank not chained as required
-
Clean Cloths Hair RestraintInspector note: Not all staff were property dressed with uniforms or hair restraints
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Refrigerated units not being maintained at proper temperatures
-
Equipment ThermometersInspector note: No thermometer in 4 door reach in where salad & breakfast items are kept
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on June 30, 2008: 7 findings recurred. 5 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Roslindale
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.