?
Sepal
December 14, 2016 · Administrative hearing
🫥not rated
- official resultAdministrative hearing
- inspection typeEating & Drinking w/ Take Out
- failed findings3
- critical findings2
📁 This is an administrative record, not a health inspection. It does not replace the restaurant's latest meaningful health result.
Failed findings
-
Cold HoldingcriticalInspector note: The refrigerator in the front is not working and there are products stored on the fridge; tomatoes 60F hummus 60F (Items discarded). Provide proper cold holding of 41F or below. (12/14/16 The front refrigerator is still not working. The employees have put the items on ice but they are not maintaining temperatures; cut tomatoes are 47F and hummus is 50F after stirring the product. Provide proper cold holding of 41F or below) The upright refrigerator is not maintaining temperature; pickled turnips 45F hot sauce 46F. Provide proper cold holding of 41F or below. (Pass)
-
Person in charge AssignedcriticalInspector note: There is no person in charge at the establishmnet when the manager is not working. Provide a PIC trained by the certified manager for all hours of service.
-
Inadequate Facilities/Cooling MethodsInspector note: Okra in the reach in is cooling in deep covered plastic containers. Provide proper cooling methods and validate that items are being cooled properly from 140F to 70F in two hours and then from70F to 41F in an additional four hours. (Pass) 12/14/16 The refrigerator in the front is not maintaining product temperature. Provide ample refrigeration to maintain product temperature.
Checks marked passed
-
ReheatingcriticalInspector note: The okra on the hot holding unit was just reheated and it's 90F. Provide proper reheat temperature of 165F and hot holding temperature of 140F.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: There is peeling paint above the sink and numerous ceiling tiles are soiled. Clean and remove any peeling paint.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on December 7, 2016: 3 findings recurred. 2 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Longwood
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.