✓
Ula Cafe
April 28, 2009 · Pass
😇clean
- official resultPass
- resultPass
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings0
- critical findings0
✓ No failed findings were recorded; 15 code checks were marked passed.
Checks marked passed
-
Labeling of IngredientscriticalInspector note: Pre packed foods not properly labeled.
-
Location AccessiblecriticalInspector note: Food particles in both hand sink basin.
-
Labeled Common NamecriticalInspector note: Detergent container not labeled.
-
Separation/Sanitizer CriteriacriticalInspector note: Detergent container not covered
-
Non-Compliance w/Employee Health Policycritical
-
Insects Rodents AnimalsInspector note: Evidence of rodent. droppings behind grease trap & dish machine
-
Food Container LabelsInspector note: Label bulk food containers.
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: Cloth towel stored on bread
-
Clean Cloths Hair RestraintInspector note: Food handler not wearing hair restraint (preparing sandwiches) Food handlers wearing headbands-provide proper hair restraints.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: No splash guard between hand sink & clean equipment storage.
-
Wiping Cloths Clean SanitizeInspector note: In use wiping cloths not stored in a sanitizing solution. • Provide separate sanitizing solution for wiping cloths used for raw animal products ready to eat foods & non food contacts.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: clean exterior of grease trap.
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: No signage at hand sinks.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Ceiling in disrepair chipping peeling paint & openings. Repair & seal. • Dust ceiling vent.
-
Anti-Choking
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on April 21, 2009: 15 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Roxbury
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.