✕
La Difference Restaurant
March 22, 2011 · Fail
🪳cooked
- official resultFail
- resultFail
- inspection typeEating & Drinking
- failed findings9
- critical findings2
Failed findings
-
Location AccessiblecriticalInspector note: T INSPECTION -hand sink not accessibile for use-blocked with items --CORRECT the hand sink can not be used for any reason other than handwashing--
-
PIC KnowledgecriticalInspector note: AT RE-INSPECTION- the serve / safe certified person must have completed the ALLERGY AWARENESS course-information on course given by inspector to staff- & POST an allergy awareness notice on wall & on menus--
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: KITCHEN- in refrige --keep all food covered or wrapped- - & do not store any food product on floor -keep off floor at least 6 inches--
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: CLEAN the microwave both inside & out of built-up food grime--& CLEAN the white sink off built-up grime-
-
Clean Equipment & Utensils StorageInspector note: STORE all pot & pans "face" down -to help protect insides from possibile contamination -
-
Hand Cleaner Drying Tissue SignageInspector note: AT INSPECTION-no towels at hand sink ( empty roller )-CORRECT-
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: CLEAN the floor through-out kitchen off built-up grime & grease INCLUDING under & around all equiptment--
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: CLEAN the walls through-out the kitchen of built-up grime & grease film--INCLUDING wall behind stoves & HOOD filters--
-
Inadequate LightingInspector note: KITCHEN-- replace the burnt-out ceiling light bulbs --to provide adequate lighting--
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Pass on September 17, 2010: 9 findings appeared for the first time.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in Roxbury
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.