Casa Blanca is currently Fail from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on February 13, 2009. Inspectors wrote up 2 critical violations — the kind most directly linked to foodborne illness. On Cooked's ladder that reads cooked 🪳.
These are the violations recorded at the most recent inspection on February 13, 2009, in plain English, with the city's own wording underneath.
Casa Blanca has 5 inspections on record going back to March 11, 2008.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| December 30, 2012 | — | |
| February 17, 2009 | — | |
| February 13, 2009 | Fail | |
| March 25, 2008 | Pass | |
| March 11, 2008 | Fail |
Roxbury runs 83% clean across 708 tracked restaurants — 559 clean, 69 mid, 49 cooked.
Against the 708 spots Cooked tracks in Roxbury, this one comes out cleaner than 2% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor — temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily — this listing's most recent inspection is dated February 13, 2009. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.