✓
Shaw's Supermarket No. 3577
January 29, 2015 · Pass
😇clean
- official resultPass
- resultPass
- inspection typeRetail Food
- failed findings0
- critical findings0
✓ No failed findings were recorded; 5 code checks were marked passed.
Checks marked passed
-
Food ProtectionInspector note: PIC removed out of date product in the freezer section. PIC will need to review with staff to monitor dates.
-
Non-Food Contact SurfacesInspector note: Repair ripped gasket in freezer door for vegetables. Monitor and check all. Repalce or clean to remove a build up of black stains on cutting board in meat prep room. Cutting board under black styrofoam containers and ones to the right. Paint to seal rusty shelves for clean equipment in hot food warewashing area. And any others.
-
Non-Food Contact Surfaces CleanInspector note: Clean shelves in walk in refrigerators under raw meats and under peppers (produce) in retail area exterior of cooking equipment in hot foods and sliding doors to deli. Clean exterior of bulk foods in bakery.
-
Improper Maintenance of FloorsInspector note: Clean all the floors in all walk in refrigerators under shelves and prep tables. Clean floor in back storage area and around trash compactor. Clean floor under cooking equipment bakery prep tables and all freezers. Coving in meat room rusty and cement in milk walk in coming apart.
-
premises not properly maintained or cleanedOfficial wording: Improper Maintenance of Walls/CeilingsInspector note: Repair wall to warewashing area in hot food molding/ trim in freezer for ice cream (between fans on wall) and repair metal falling off door in produce. Clean walls in produce area and bakery. Clean doors going into walk in refrigerators.
What changed since the previous inspection?
Compared with Fail on January 20, 2015: 5 previous findings did not recur.
Browse this restaurant's inspections
More restaurants in West Roxbury
About this record
This record comes from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division. Cooked keeps the official result and wording separate from its plain-English explanation so you can verify what the inspector actually published.
Source: Analyze Boston.