Subway Of Beacon Hill is currently Pass from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on October 5, 2010. No critical violations were recorded at that visit. On Cooked's ladder that reads clean ๐.
Nothing was written up at the most recent inspection on October 5, 2010. A clean sheet like this is the best possible result โ no violations of any severity were recorded.
Subway Of Beacon Hill has 12 inspections on record going back to January 8, 2008.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| December 30, 2012 | โ | |
| October 5, 2010 | Pass | |
| March 5, 2010 | Pass | |
| February 26, 2010 | Fail | |
| February 12, 2010 | Pass | |
| January 27, 2010 | Fail | |
| November 23, 2009 | โ | |
| June 10, 2009 | โ | |
| January 8, 2009 | โ | |
| January 18, 2008 | Pass | |
| January 18, 2008 | Pass | |
| January 8, 2008 | Fail |
West End runs 90% clean across 247 tracked restaurants โ 217 clean, 13 mid, 12 cooked.
Against the 247 spots Cooked tracks in West End, this one comes out cleaner than 10% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor โ temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily โ this listing's most recent inspection is dated October 5, 2010. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.