Coco's is currently Fail from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on October 22, 2015. No critical violations were recorded at that visit. On Cooked's ladder that reads mid 😬.
These are the violations recorded at the most recent inspection on October 22, 2015, in plain English, with the city's own wording underneath.
Coco's has 12 inspections on record going back to July 9, 2012.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| September 14, 2022 | — | |
| March 15, 2022 | — | |
| October 13, 2016 | closed by the city | |
| November 4, 2015 | — | |
| October 22, 2015 | Fail | |
| September 4, 2014 | — | |
| August 19, 2014 | Fail | |
| December 30, 2013 | — | |
| September 12, 2013 | Pass | |
| September 6, 2013 | Fail | |
| December 30, 2012 | — | |
| July 9, 2012 | Pass |
Roxbury runs 83% clean across 708 tracked restaurants — 559 clean, 69 mid, 49 cooked.
Against the 708 spots Cooked tracks in Roxbury, this one comes out cleaner than 10% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor — temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily — this listing's most recent inspection is dated October 22, 2015. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.