El Progresso Market is currently Fail from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on March 19, 2012. Inspectors wrote up 1 critical violation — the kind most directly linked to foodborne illness. On Cooked's ladder that reads cooked 🪳.
These are the violations recorded at the most recent inspection on March 19, 2012, in plain English, with the city's own wording underneath.
El Progresso Market has 15 inspections on record going back to November 7, 2007. The 12 most recent are shown below.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| December 30, 2012 | — | |
| April 13, 2012 | closed by the city | |
| April 9, 2012 | closed by the city | |
| March 19, 2012 | Fail | |
| March 12, 2012 | Fail | |
| March 5, 2012 | Fail | |
| August 1, 2011 | — | |
| February 4, 2011 | — | |
| October 25, 2010 | Pass | |
| June 24, 2010 | — | |
| March 29, 2010 | — | |
| November 6, 2009 | Pass |
Roxbury runs 83% clean across 708 tracked restaurants — 559 clean, 69 mid, 49 cooked.
Against the 708 spots Cooked tracks in Roxbury, this one comes out cleaner than 9% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor — temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily — this listing's most recent inspection is dated March 19, 2012. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.