La Pupusa Guanaca
- resultFail
- critical violations0
- last inspectedMarch 2, 2010 β
- address378 Centre St, Jamaica Plain 02130
Is La Pupusa Guanaca clean?
La Pupusa Guanaca is currently Fail from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on March 2, 2010. No critical violations were recorded at that visit. On Cooked's ladder that reads mid π¬.
What did inspectors find at La Pupusa Guanaca?
These are the violations recorded at the most recent inspection on March 2, 2010, in plain English, with the city's own wording underneath.
- β οΈFloors Designed Constructed Installed
- π§Ήpremises not properly maintained or cleanedImproper Maintenance of Walls/Ceilings
La Pupusa Guanaca inspection and administrative history
La Pupusa Guanaca has 11 inspections on record going back to October 3, 2007.
June 13, 2022 Inspection not required
This is an administrative record, not a health inspection.
View full inspection βDecember 30, 2012 Inspection not required
This is an administrative record, not a health inspection.
View full inspection βOctober 19, 2010 Out of business
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βMarch 2, 2010 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βMarch 1, 2010 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βNovember 12, 2009 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βSeptember 11, 2009 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βMay 11, 2009 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βApril 28, 2009 Fail
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βOctober 24, 2008 Administrative record filed
This is an administrative record, not a health inspection.
View full inspection βOctober 3, 2007 Pass
Loading inspection detailsβ¦
View full inspection βLa Pupusa Guanaca vs Mission Hill
Mission Hill runs 79% clean across 242 tracked restaurants β 183 clean, 24 mid, 25 cooked.
Against the 242 spots Cooked tracks in Mission Hill, this one comes out cleaner than 19% of them.
Other spots in Mission Hill
How Boston grades restaurants
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor β temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Read the Boston ratings guide β
Inspection findings and available history come from the authorityβs published records. Cooked checks daily; publication can lag behind an inspection. Read the date on each result and check the official source for newer information.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily β this listing's most recent inspection is dated March 2, 2010. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.
check your own block πΈ
Cooked covers 10 cities on official inspection data β see who's clean, mid, or cooked near you.