K F C X721622 is currently Pass from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on December 1, 2010. No critical violations were recorded at that visit. On Cooked's ladder that reads clean ๐.
Nothing was written up at the most recent inspection on December 1, 2010. A clean sheet like this is the best possible result โ no violations of any severity were recorded.
K F C X721622 has 26 inspections on record going back to May 31, 2007. The 12 most recent are shown below.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| December 30, 2012 | โ | |
| December 1, 2010 | Pass | |
| March 31, 2010 | โ | |
| March 1, 2010 | Pass | |
| February 17, 2010 | Fail | |
| February 10, 2010 | Fail | |
| October 16, 2009 | Pass | |
| October 2, 2009 | Fail | |
| April 13, 2009 | โ | |
| March 30, 2009 | Fail | |
| January 20, 2009 | โ | |
| January 12, 2009 | Fail |
Roxbury runs 83% clean across 708 tracked restaurants โ 559 clean, 69 mid, 49 cooked.
Against the 708 spots Cooked tracks in Roxbury, this one comes out cleaner than 17% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor โ temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily โ this listing's most recent inspection is dated December 1, 2010. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.