Phoenicia is currently Pass from Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division, from an inspection on September 9, 2010. No critical violations were recorded at that visit. On Cooked's ladder that reads clean ๐.
These are the violations recorded at the most recent inspection on September 9, 2010, in plain English, with the city's own wording underneath.
Phoenicia has 23 inspections on record going back to May 2, 2007. The 12 most recent are shown below.
| date | result | score |
|---|---|---|
| December 30, 2012 | โ | |
| September 9, 2010 | Pass | |
| September 2, 2010 | Fail | |
| August 16, 2010 | Fail | |
| April 22, 2010 | Pass | |
| April 8, 2010 | Fail | |
| December 23, 2009 | Fail | |
| August 24, 2009 | โ | |
| August 10, 2009 | Fail | |
| July 22, 2009 | Fail | |
| July 8, 2009 | Fail | |
| July 6, 2009 | Fail |
Beacon Hill runs 85% clean across 149 tracked restaurants โ 123 clean, 10 mid, 11 cooked.
Against the 149 spots Cooked tracks in Beacon Hill, this one comes out cleaner than 15% of them.
Boston reports inspections as a pass or a fail, with no score and no letter. What separates a bad fail from a trivial one is the violation severity ladder: a single star is a minor issue, two stars is more serious, and three stars marks a critical foodborne-illness risk factor โ temperature abuse, bad handwashing, cross-contamination. A restaurant can fail on paperwork alone, which is not the same as failing on food safety. Cooked splits Boston fails accordingly: a fail with a three-star violation reads cooked, a fail on minor items only reads mid.
Source: Boston Inspectional Services, Health Division via Analyze Boston. Cooked refreshes this data daily โ this listing's most recent inspection is dated September 9, 2010. Inspection results describe one moment in a kitchen's life, not a permanent verdict.